<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: benchmarking egov2.0: first proposal on transparency</title>
	<atom:link href="http://egov20.wordpress.com/2008/01/28/benchmarking-egov20-first-proposal-on-transparency/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://egov20.wordpress.com/2008/01/28/benchmarking-egov20-first-proposal-on-transparency/</link>
	<description>Discussion: what are the strategic goals and how to measure the achievements of e-gov.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 10:03:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: the ideal format of government bills &#171; Benchmarking e-gov in web 2.0</title>
		<link>http://egov20.wordpress.com/2008/01/28/benchmarking-egov20-first-proposal-on-transparency/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>the ideal format of government bills &#171; Benchmarking e-gov in web 2.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 11:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://egov20.wordpress.com/?p=6#comment-33</guid>
		<description>[...] the ideal format of government&#160;bills  MySociety.org just launched a campaign to make bills available over the internet in a standardised format.This could be very well applicable to other government data, e.g. the planning applications.An that is also what private companies ask government to do, for example Google Transit with public sector data.So, this described format could well be the stage 4 of the benchmarking model we are trying to discuss here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the ideal format of government&nbsp;bills  MySociety.org just launched a campaign to make bills available over the internet in a standardised format.This could be very well applicable to other government data, e.g. the planning applications.An that is also what private companies ask government to do, for example Google Transit with public sector data.So, this described format could well be the stage 4 of the benchmarking model we are trying to discuss here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: initiative: open budget index &#171; Benchmarking e-gov in web 2.0</title>
		<link>http://egov20.wordpress.com/2008/01/28/benchmarking-egov20-first-proposal-on-transparency/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>initiative: open budget index &#171; Benchmarking e-gov in web 2.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 18:20:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://egov20.wordpress.com/?p=6#comment-18</guid>
		<description>[...] open budget&#160;index  following Jack&#8217;s suggestion , I had a look at the Open Budget Index. Very interesting: they developed a system to measure the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] open budget&nbsp;index  following Jack&#8217;s suggestion , I had a look at the Open Budget Index. Very interesting: they developed a system to measure the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: osimod</title>
		<link>http://egov20.wordpress.com/2008/01/28/benchmarking-egov20-first-proposal-on-transparency/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>osimod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 08:19:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://egov20.wordpress.com/?p=6#comment-6</guid>
		<description>many thanks Jack. Looks very interesting, I&#039;ll look into the methodology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>many thanks Jack. Looks very interesting, I&#8217;ll look into the methodology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://egov20.wordpress.com/2008/01/28/benchmarking-egov20-first-proposal-on-transparency/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 01:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://egov20.wordpress.com/?p=6#comment-5</guid>
		<description>Have you seen the work of the International Budget Project on budget transparency rankings?

http://www.openbudgetindex.org/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you seen the work of the International Budget Project on budget transparency rankings?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.openbudgetindex.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.openbudgetindex.org/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
