Infographics – when policy reports become like Ikea furniture

July 8, 2014

Policy reports are becoming more and more visually appealing. Well designed templates, figures, summaries, infographic, snappy and tweetable sentences.

This is good and to be welcome. Yet I can’t help thinking that there’s a common pattern with Ikea furniture.

What are the features of Ikea furniture?

  1. appealing design
  2. extreme usability and fitness-for-purpose – they meet exactly our need and fulfill immediately a need
  3. low durability

The first two features mirror closely what is happening in policy reports. My impression is that the third point is also a feature of new policy reports: less attention for robust evidence, and focus on data points that can be easily communicated. Policy reports have shorter and shorter durability.

I do not think that this is a necessarily true. Good design does not imply superficial findings. But from what I see around me, it often happens to be true.

And maybe it’s a bigger trend? You could apply the three criteria to most products – think mobile phones.

Maybe the big news is that policy reports are becoming more and more similar to consumer products? The consumerization of policy?


Of Tables, Mindmaps, Venn diagrams, Scrabble and metro maps

June 16, 2014

Some time ago I stated my passion for mindmaps, tables and Venn diagrams as tool to capture relations between entities.

I just realize how important a tool could be, for analytical purposes, metro maps. They allow to create many different links between many different groups.

The most famous application is probably the 2008 web trend map

In the policy domain, it’s becoming more and more popular as a metaphor of joined up policy making. Here is a map, from the Grand Coalition for Digital Jobs.

I am trying to learn how to build such maps. In the meantime, I realize that Scrabble could be used for a similar structure.

So my questions are:

  • Could a Scrabble visualisation be used in the same way of a MetroMap?
  • What is the meaning of the different representation forms?
  • Is there any logical meaning in this sequence: Mindmap > Table > Venn > Metromap?

UPDATE: I would visualize my thinking as in this image – but I dont know what is the link between the elements!

thinktools

 


Mapping the EU data economy: inspiring cases of #dataintensivepolicy #policy20

May 23, 2014

One of the most interesting projects of this year is the EU data market study. With IDC, we have to define, map, measure and engage the big data landscape in Europe.

We are now working on a report of data-intensive policy making. Basically it’s about the use of big data in decision making in government.

We’re identifying inspiring cases to show what are the risks and opportunities of big data applied to policy making.

Projects we consider as inspiring are:

As usual, we’ve set up a Diigo group where we collect relevant cases. Please join the group and submit relevant cases, or simply tweet such cases using #dataintensivepolicy

What are the most inspiring examples of data intensive policy making?


Open government for growth: learning from the best at #forumpa Rome 29th January

May 22, 2014

In the context of a project for the European Commission, we’re organising an event in collaboration with ForumPA  (the biggest e-gov fair in Italy) in Rome in a week or so.

The goal is to build on the policy recommendations that we developed with stakeholders at the last workshop in Brussels. How does open government help us to untangle new opportunities for growth?

The key issues to be addressed cover:

  • Governance, policy and strategy: e.g. how to avoid fragmentation and ensure long-term innovation?
  • Cultural change and uptake: e.g. how to establish trust between government and business?
  • Implementation, standards and technology: e.g. how to ensure integration within the publis sector and with third party service provider?
  • Feedback and service re-design: e.g. how to channel it in the institutional process to stimulate innovation and high-quality service delivery?

The work will be opened by the European Commission. We’re then having some of my favourite initiatives coming there to speak:

  • - the Greek government Diavgeia initiative
  • - Barcelona Smart City
  • - Helsinki CitySDK
  • - Network analysis built on OpenCoesione data
  • - the Bulgarian Single Point of Contact for business
  • - the Wheresmyvillo Belgian initiative to monitor public-private partnership

The workshop will be highly interactive, alternating cases studies with policy discussion.We will also use the instavi.be app to vote, helped by its developer who will participate to the workshop.

At the end, we should come up with hands on recommendations for the next European Commission on how to stimulate growth through openness!

 

 


What I said at #openconf14 : openness as a goal and as a tool

February 21, 2014

My final presentation at #okioconf14 is embedded above and downloadable here. Finally it became quite different from what I originally planned. Some new concepts, different from previous speeches, are:

  • openness in both science and government share common drivers, impacts and barriers
  • openness should not be a dogma but a strategy, it should be finely adapted to pursue specific goals: for instance, co-creation does not work.
  • but openness is also a goal in itself, a value necessary to both democracy and science. Science is reproducible or is not science.
  • one key question we must address is: is open government just for young, rich, cultivated people? is it beneficiary mainly to the elite? We must work urgently to answer this question.
  • overall, we have achieved lots but have promised more, and we are just waiting for a “bubble burst” of inflated expectations of open government.

what I’ll say at #okioconf14 : discussing early ideas

February 13, 2014

Next Friday, I’ve been invited to speak at Okioconf.es. And I very much look forward to it.

Normally, I give speeches to policy-makers and I have to convince them about the importance of openness. This time, I am preaching to the converted. And as always, I want the speech to be a little bit out of the comfort zone.

Right now I’m trying to think about what I’m going to say. Let me share with you some random thoughts, so that I try to find a good story to tell. Forgive me if this is all a bit random.

I want to talk about openness in different domains: open public services; open policy making; open data; open science.

I’d like to talk about the fact that opening up should not be expected to create dramatic change. We failed dramatically in managing expectations: we promised to change government for good, eliminate corruption, improve policy, and create jobs through apps based on open data. It didn’t happen. It’s not that once you open data and processes, people flood there to reuse the data, create new services. It does not happen this way: not in open government, not in open data, not in open science

Openness does not automatically generate change. It simply removes some of the barriers to change. The key argument is not about the benefit of openness, but about the cost of non-openness. Unpredictably, somewhere, somehow, openness enables impact.

We should not hype the benefits of openness, but denounce the illogicality of closeness.

Another idea I want to share is that it’s not about total openness. We should not be rigid. We should recognise and accept some form of intellectual property, competition, individual interests, egoism and vanity. We need sharing literacy, not sharing culture. Openness is for all, not only for the evangelists!

I think we would all benefit from a more lightweight approach to openness. Don’t push it as the solution to all problems, but emphasise how illogical it is to be closed. Don’t claim that everything should be open, but accept that some things are not for sharing, that sharing does not apply to everything. A kind of third way of openness :)

Once you recognize this, you can really have an impact, because you try to act on the incentives to openness – rather than convincing people that open is good.

Also, I’d like to talk about openness as a mean, not as a goal. I’d like to link openness and sharing to the move from product to services. When the economy it’s service-based, it makes sense to give the product for free, because then you can sell services on top of them (e.g. open source software). But is it right? Is it really true that we should renounce totally to selling reproducible products just because they can be reproduced? Are high margin by definition bad? And conversely, sharing is important today also as a way to be known, to have an audience and then to sell. It’s a kind of advertising or marketing.

So maybe I really want to talk about the possible co-existence of openness and capitalism. Something like “Openness: the highest stage of capitalism“. That would be a good title for my talk.


How can #egov support business growth? Come to learn from the best – Brussels Feb 6th

January 27, 2014

In a little more than a week, on february 6th, we’re hosting a seminar in Brussels which I particularly look forward to.

The basic question is how can e-government services support business growth, going beyond the traditional view of “cutting red tape”. It is superfluous to mention how important it is today to promote growth in Europe.

Our goal (in the context of a contract for the EC) is to identify the key lessons learnt from existing practice, and to understand what are the bottlenecks to be addressed.

To do so, we invited some of the most inspiring initiatives in Europe:

  • Jaana Lappi (Ministerial Advisor) and Benita Troberg (Project manager) from the Ministry of Employment and Economy (FINLAND) – for the case Enterprise Finland
  • Mihkel Tikk from the Department of State (ESTONIA) – for the case of the portal eesti.ee
  • Helle Schade-Sørensen from the Danish Agency for Digitisation (DENMARK) – for the case Nem Handel
  • Lidio Viérin and Guido Piovano, representatives from the single contact point for the Region Valle d’Aosta (ITALY)
  • Giulio Aimeri (Forum P.A.) for an overview of Italian best practices
  • Sergio Jerez, Municipality of Barcelona, on the joint strategy of open data for business startups
  • Stefan Fittner, project manager of the Business Service Portal (Austria)

The seminar is designed for maximum interaction, with input expected from all participants, not only for speakers. We have post-it session, live voting sessions, and we will develop together key policy recommendations for the EC.

Participation is free, on a first come first served basis. Register HERE.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,913 other followers